HoodieClinton massively outspent Trump last time right. Is there any suggestion that she would have won if she had spent more? It seemed to me that the issue is that she didn’t target overall campaign efforts in the right areas. I do wonder if all this fundraising and celebrity endorsement is kind of like fighting the last war. Maybe that’s a better avenue than getting Eddie Van Halen 1955-2020 Thanks For The Memories Signature Tee Shirt. If people could be inspired to get involved and campaign in their local area themselves. Fight back against the idea that it’s only a certain type of educated, liberal, wealthy elite that are against Trump. I think the argument against Clinton is that she spent wrong not too little. Less money in Cali and NY and more in the Midwest. So good. So happy. Thank you so much. Ok.
Eddie Van Halen 1955-2020 Thanks For The Memories Signature Tee Shirt, Tank Top, V-neck, Sweatshirt And Hoodie
I’m not an American, but my sense is that Clinton just fundamentally didn’t appeal to the types of voters in the blue states that Trump won. Maybe campaigning more would have just reminded more of Eddie Van Halen 1955-2020 Thanks For The Memories Signature Tee Shirts. Basically, it’s the message rather than the number of times. I think you’re right that Hillary campaigning in states like Wisconsin and Michigan might not have helped, but I feel like she absolutely took Pennsylvania for granted. Pennsylvania is a battleground state because it’s part of the northeast liberal corridor and has parts that are very urban, but ALSO has a ton of blue-collar workers in energy jobs that feel threatened by progressive climate change politics. She assumed the urban, college-educated voters would outnumber the rural working class.